Save the Phenomena

This is old news to me, but the article was brought to my attention, so I wanted to write about this topic again.

The Appendix: Useful And In Fact Promising

Regarding vestigial organs; the list used to contain dozens of organs and body parts, but over time, as scientists actually did their job, many have been reclassified and have been removed from the list. That in itself should motivate scientists to carry out the proper method of scientific inquiry! Even though this article is written by pro-evolutionists as made evident by the exclamation "we're not saying that Darwinian evolution is wrong", it goes a long way to show how scientists operate.

The violation that many pro Darwinian evolution scientists make is that whenever they can't explain something, they immediately define a cause that fits their preconceived theories BEFORE they complete all their observation and experimentation. As with vestigial organs; if they don't know what the purpose of the appendix is, they automatically classify it as a remnant of our evolutionary past. This was true with tonsils, adenoids, lymphatic glands, and many other organs.

Respectable science, when faced with an unanswered phenomena, should say "We don't know the purpose of this is or why it behaves the way it does, but with further observation we hope to discover the truth in time". I can respect that position. But instead they immediately apply ridiculous causes like chance or simply throw it in the category of "evolutionary remnant". To me that's scientific malpractice and at a minimum supreme arrogance.

See also my articles:
The Soft Pillow of Science
By Chance Given Time
Natural Selection

Speaking With A Forked Tongue - "Free Abortions For Everyone"

Have you noticed the counter on the side bar of my blog. At the time of this posting it is nearing 45,000,000 abortions since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.

Now the debate in our land is over the President's Heathcare Reform. Lots to worry about, but one of the many debated points on this legislation is whether the public option will include tax payer provided abortion services. The President claims it doesn't, but notice his double speak. In trying to promote his plan he spoke to a gathering of religious leaders, albeit, very liberal religious leaders.

In a late Wednesday conference call with several faith groups that supported his presidential bid, President Barack Obama claimed it is a “fabrication” and “distraction” to say abortion funding is included in the health care reform plans pending in Congress. He said it is false to suggest that the government-run health care plan he favors would result in “government funding of abortions,” and that this is “untrue.” - Associated Press

Notice the President said the government-run health care plan he favors wouldn't support government funding for abortions. Sure. He says that as if to say, I am not in favor of it, but if the version that comes to my desk has it in it... what? Will he sign it, or won't he sign it? What do you think?

First of all our government already uses our tax money to fund abortions both here and abroad. One of the first Presidential actions was to reverse the Mexico City Accord which in doing so now allows US funds to be used for abortions overseas. Our government already subsidizes Planned Parenthood the largest for profit abortion provider in the nation. So what do you think? Is the President telling the truth? Let's listen to Mr. Obama's own words and thanks to the group who put this together for providing explanations on screen to translate the double talk.



Did you hear how he also wants to force private insurers to provide abortion services just like the government plan will. This is just like his disdain for doctors who refuse to provide abortions or pharmacists who won't dispense "morning after" pills for reasons of conscience. He could care less.

T. Rex Soft Tissue Is Real

This is an update to a discovery I've been following, and it is as a win-win for me. I've written a few articles on this so click on this link to be brought to one, which also contains links to other similar articles.

Here is a quick run down. Back in 2007 a discovery was made of a T. Rex fossil that contained soft tissue. The problem is that modern science believes that T. Rex died off some 68 million years ago and so that creates a problem. The problem is that scientists know that over millions of years no soft tissue can survive the fossilization process. The sedimentary rock encasing the fossil might allow for survival of soft tissue, but only for several thousands of years, not millions. I agree with that logic and so, based on the finding the scientists must make a decision. Either adjust the current theoretical understanding of the ages these dinosaurs were alive, or show that there are errors in the discovery of the soft tissue. Guess which direction most scientists decided to take? Right! First instinct is to protect the theory they have backed and in which they have upheld as true. Can't say I blame them.

But the good news is that after third party study and verification, it has been found that in fact the soft tissue is real. CHA-CHING! Read: Re-examination of T. Rex Verifies Disputed Biochemical Remains.

As I always say I am for good science. Allow the truth to be known and let it take us where ever it takes us. Based on current understanding no soft tissue can survive the fossilization process for millions of years. When soft tissue is found you either have to adjust the current theory to allow for a younger earth or show how organic material can survive longer periods. The problem is that there is no known process that can extend the survival rate of soft tissue from a few thousand years to 68 million! Why not just be humble and say that based on the current finding adjustments in the current theories need to be made. How about because of ego and fear.

Folks, I don't care if you call me crazy or stupid. Our earth is much younger than what modern science thinks.

UPDATED: Culture Of Death Phase 4 - Abort Living Adults

God help us, really.

I haven't written much on this whole Government take over of health care. I try to focus on issues of freedom of religion and pro-life. I guess I didn't look deep enough.

It's only a matter of time really. When a government like ours controls your health care it also will do it's best to pigeon hole you into making decisions that are right for government, not for you. For those of you that voted all of this stuff in, I hope and pray you do a better job of keeping track of what is going on.



Here is an article about the Federal Government's version: "End of Life" Counseling Intensifies Health Care Debate

Honestly, this is getting to be more than I can handle. Watching this happen is hard. How will I handle it when it is in effect?